Bryan Hemming

short stories, comment, articles, humour and photography

Linkedin can seriously damage your internet security

Locked in

Over the last few years I have received invitations from quite a few friends to join Linkedin. Depite the fact the company boasts more than 300 million members, I’ve always refused on the premise I can’t see any personal advantage whatsoever. But I can see how trawling the internet for personal information to sell on to research and marketing companies must be very profitable indeed.

But it seems Linkedin is harbouring a very dark and dirty secret that could end up with your personal details falling into the hands of international criminal organisations. The name Linkedin is beng used by criminal gangs to invade your computer and the company doesn’t appear to be taking any steps to inform you. Quite the opposite, it seems to be flooding inboxes with so many emails it adds to the confusion, which in turn only serves to aid the criminals in pursuing their frauds on a huge scale. Added to that, many people with no connection to Linkedin at all are getting locked in to a never-ending stream of unwanted and unsoliticed spam.

Of all the virus alerts and threats to my email accounts, over the last year or so, nearly every one has been from someone, who is a genuine member of Linkedin. But even they don’t see the possible link between their membership of Linkedin and the viruses that have been affecting their email accounts.

As soon as you receive an email, purporting to come from Linkedin, you should immediately run your anti-virus program, I would go so far as to advise you to spam it, without opening it, straightaway, even if it appears to be from your oldest and most trusted friend. Then email them to ask if they have used your name in anything related to Linkedin. If you really do want to join Linkedin I strongly advise you contact them through their official site, which can be accessed through any search engine.

I have had to warn people time and time again to check their accounts for viruses, and many seem to think I’m blaming them rather than alerting them. I tell them never to give my name to Linkedin and, where they have, to stop the company sending me emails that are the result of them forwarding my details to Linkedin. In some cases, where they tell me they can’t see what all the bother is about, the problem has led to the ending of a couple of friendships. The idea they aren’t allowed to send private details of my life to any company they wish, doesn’t seem to occur to them. The fact is I have received so many emails claiming to be from Linkedin, some of which have contained viruses, that I have suffered unnecessary stress from having to constantly ensure my computer is clean. So much for the ‘social network’ that is touted around so freely. Much of what Linkedin does could be more accurately described as anti-social behaviour. Whatever I try to do doesn’t appear to discourage them.


Screenshot of page claiming I am a member of Linkedin

I believe improper use of the Linkedin name may have led to the loss of my Outlook (Hotmail) account, which was compromised earlier this year. Something Microsoft tried to fix by removing my access to it for a month, and then making it almost impossible for me to reclaim information stored in that account, by not alerting me properly, or early enough.

In order to reclaim the account — which I had held for eighteen years — Microsoft sent me several so-called codes, which changed every few seconds. I still remain unconvinced the codes really did come from Outlook. I just can’t be sure. The point is, if the servers don’t fill you in with all the information you need, at the time you need it, you can’t put your trust in them. One thing becomes abundantly clear, they certainly don’t trust you and I.

Like all the other main providers, Outlook seems to be under the rather illogical belief we can all tell the difference between a spam email and a real one, when they both look exactly the same. That’s the whole point isn’t it?

I know the identity of the person, whose account probably compromised my Outlook account, which Microsoft informed me, in a roundabout way, had almost certainly been taken over by a criminal gang.

At exactly the same time, the company was assuring journalists they were having no problems, nearly every other major company warning their subscribers of a worm infecting computers all over the world. Newspapers were urging us to immediately change our passwords for ones that were impossible to remember, and took an aeon to log on. That was only if you managed to locate the scrap of paper you wrote the new password down on. We were told our dog’s name, and date of birth, were no longer safe, and we should compose passwords which resembled scientific formulae for the origins of the universe. You’d have thought NSA and GCHQ might’ve used some of the humongous budgets they receive to spy on us – for our own protection, of course – to try to catch the criminals draining our bank accounts instead. No, it’s far more important for the security services to know who we  invited to dinner last Tuesday, and what was on the menu.

More worringly, in my particular case, the person I suspect of allowing my Outlook account to be compromised, is a civil servant working in a reasonably high position for an English county council. Obviously, such a position could allow him access to thousands of email accounts of people living in that area. Those accounts could be also compromised and the information sold on. Bank account details, and other private information, could’ve been obtained by people you wouldn’t trust to guard a camel turd for a couple of minutes while you nipped off for a whizz. I’m not saying that happened, and even if it did, I have received emails that inform me I am bind me to confidential clauses that could put me in breach of the Offical Secrets Act if I were to reveal the contents, no matter if they were just details of a bus timetable. These clever dicks try to cover every angle, so you can’t reveal the scale of their incompetence. That would never do. Trust in government and secrecy is vital for ensuring our own protection and, well, ensuring our trust in government and secrecy. Orwell would be sniggering in his grave.

But to return to Linkedin. To my mind, the compay’s activities amount to little little more than internet stalking, as they use every means possible to force people to join, if only to stop them sending you emails inviting you to join. If you reply to their request to verify you know someone, who has joined Linkedin, they will use that to claim you are a member of Linkedin. If you don’t join, they hound you to death with emails two, three or more times a week, even after you confine their emails to the spam bin. And, despite their claims to the contrary, they do it for months that mount into years. They are becoming their own worst enemy, as you can no longer be sure whether the emails are genuine, or from one of the criminal cloning gangs intent on stealing your identity and your email account.

Linkedin claim I am a member of their social network in Spain. I can assure you I am not. And there isn’t another Bryan Hemming in living Spain, who is a member of Linkedin. Their own page proves it. If there is, he hasn’t given them any of his details, despite Linkedin’s claim you can link to them.

If you click onto the button saying ver el perfil completo de Bryan which translates as see Bryan’s complete profile and refers to a Bryan Hemming they claim is a member of Linkedin living in Spain, it takes you straight to a registration form for you to sign up to Linkedin. As I can find no other Bryan Hemming living in Spain on any search engine I have to assume the entry refers to  me. Every other entry does. In legal terms this is known as misrepresentation. They have no right to use my name in this way.

Here is the supposed Linkedin link for the Bryan Hemming living in Spain, I followed from the Google entry: Linkedin claim you can not only find out information about me but also you can contact me directly by using it. Those claims are completely, and provably, false. You cannot contact anyone with my name in Spain through Linkedin.

Despite Linkedin’s claim, there is no member of Linkedin in Spain registered under the name Bryan Hemming. It’s a complete and utter lie, which goes against my professional interests, as I do not want my name or my work to be connected to Linkedin in any way whatsoever. I believe the brand has become irretrievably tarnished, and  linking my name to a direputable company with questionable ethics, will tarnish my image. But it seems I don’t have that choice, Linkedin appears to believe they have the right to appropriate anybody’s name without payment, or permission, to advertise their product.

Avoid Linkedin. If they aren’t trying to garner information about you to sell on, one of their imitators is trying hack into your address book, clone your email account, or infect your computer with a virus. And because of all the criminal gangs pretending to be Linkedin, you cannot be sufficiently confident you are joining the real Linkedin or handing over your personal details and address book to a gangs of thieves, who will try to rob you, and as many of you family members and friends as they can. Linkedin offer you no security whatsoever, and will not compensate you for any loss. Their own practices already stray into some very grey areas, so what do they care about guarding your personal details from criminal activity? It’s their business to let as many people have your details as want them. After all, they don’t claim to be a charity.

But I’m not the only one who believes the Linkedin brand is a stain on their image, growing numbers their own subscribers do. Linkedin are  having to face mounting legal actions against them for pursuing practices similar to the ones I have already described. Only recently, U.S. District Judge Lucy H. Koh in San Jose, North California gave the green light for a lawsuit against Linkedin to go ahead for violating the privacy of its users. And news of the company’s dubious practices is finally beginning to seep into the mainstream media. Among other news outlets, Britain’s The Guardian ran the story under the title: Linkedin must face privacy lawsuit over contact reminder emails, says judge, on June 13th this year. Bloomberg News also covered the story Linkedin Ordered to Face Customer E-Mail Contacts Lawsuit,  leading with a graph showing how Linkedin’s share price may have been be affected by all the bad news. Linkedin’s effort to fight the cases is almost certainly doomed to lead to more class actions being pursued, generating even more bad publicity, and the possibility that members will start to leave in droves.

Linkedin should be investigated by the authorities for malpractice, and overly-aggressive marketing leading to distress. They should own up to the fact the brand has been so severely compromised it now poses a danger to your computer, and your bank accounts. They should also be prosecuted for sending nuisance mail. I would go even further, and suggest there should be a new law introduced to stop abuse of the internet that causes financial or psychological damage, or could lead directly to internet accounts being compromised by third parties. Companies should be obliged to report such abuses by law, once notified, and to compensate the victims for any damages, financial, or psychological, incurred.

All people who feel that Linkedin has overstepped a boundary, beyond which they feel they are being harassed  by Linkedin, are invited to share their personal experiences below.

Copyright © 2014 Bryan Hemming

12 comments on “Linkedin can seriously damage your internet security

  1. I quit LinkedIn, Twitter, MySpace, Instagram, Pinterest and my professional Facebook page all in the same week. I now prefer the soberness of a wordpress blog as my only internet presence.


    • Bryan Hemming
      September 2, 2014

      Thanks for your input. Though I can see the point in getting publicity using these networks, for a limited number of people, the amount of privacy being sacrificed hardly seems worth it.

      The problem is when they mine your address book for the addresses of your contacts to hassle them endlessly to the point where you can actually lose valuable old friends rather than gain new ones.

      I have cut contacts with a couple of old friends simply because I got fed-up with receiving spam, which came directly through their membership of Linkedin yet they denied any responsibility for. When the spam keeps on coming two or three times a week, for over a year, despite being dispatched to the spam bin, it begins to fit the legal definition of harassment.

      You may not get as many ‘followers’ on WordPress, but many of the ones you do get do actually follow you and read your stuff, as you can see by the statistics. Many of my followers are reading one or two articles a visit, sometimes more. With a lot of my work consisting of way over 1,000 words that means they’re spending quite some time here.

      Most people on social networks seems to be developing the attention span of a gnat, which doesn’t auger well for brain evolution.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. imminerva
    August 16, 2014

    Wow. This is really new information. Would like to investigate this more now that I am even publishing from that platform.


  3. theodorous
    July 27, 2014

    Unless you are a criminal or lonely or under 25-years of age.


    • Bryan Hemming
      July 28, 2014

      Sadly, I think you’re right. Seems most social networks are designed for people with the attention span of a gnat. Criminals, governments and marketing firms love them because they get all the info they want, handed on a plate, for free. Meanwhile, as a person in the design field, you might get a job offer from Guinea-Bissau to design a field, if your’re very lucky, or very unlucky, depending on how you look at it, or how desperate you are.

      Thanks for passing by and commenting.


  4. theodorous
    July 27, 2014

    Thank you for the observations. I tried using LinkedIn on the suggestion by others in the design field and maintained a page filled with personal information for several years. I cannot say that it helped me get new work, form useful contacts or improve on my product…so what use is it?
    I gave it up, along with FB and Google because they are indeed predatory in their information gathering and frankly quite useless unless.


  5. Bryan Hemming
    July 25, 2014

    Almost had me there, Wesley. I’ve added a few links since posting yesterday, to back up some of the information I give. LinkedIn are facing some heavy lawsuits, and even though US justice seems to lean towards the interests of big business too often, we may see some surprising results.

    Watch where the money goes. There are signs some of it may be starting to jump the LinkedIn ship.

    By the way, want to by an secondhand 1970s Honda Civic? Been in my garage for years. Good little runner, formerly owned a vicar’s wife, hardly ever been used, I swear it hasn’t…

    Thanks for your comment, Wesley.


  6. colltales
    July 25, 2014

    I’m right there with you, Bryan. I’ve been a member for several years now, but while it’s still a place where most potential employers gather information about me, it also gives away to all sorts of snooping and privacy breaches. It even sends embarrassing ‘reminders’ of someone’s birthday, for instance, to their whole network. And this business of viruses is even worst. We’re definitely losing all sense of what’s private and what belongs out there and companies such as LI and Facebook, which I’ve quit years ago, think they can do whatever they want with your information, specially realize profits. In the U.S., more so than in Europe, they actually can, unfortunately. I’m glad you brought that up. Thanks Bryan. By the way, I’ve sent ‘Bryan Hemming’ an invitation to please join my network, along with a link to you Website to all my contacts, and I…. Relax, I’m just kidding. Best


  7. auntyuta
    July 25, 2014

    Thanks for the warning, Bryan. It boggles the mind how security on the internet can be compromised.


    • Bryan Hemming
      July 25, 2014

      I think the ones that get to read my emails at NSA fall asleep on the job, Uta. Thanks for popping by.


  8. Wendy Kate
    July 24, 2014

    Thanks for the warning! I have had emails from them but never responded.


    • Bryan Hemming
      July 25, 2014

      Best to junk them, Wendy, unless you’re looking for a job as an executive in Dubai.


Don't bottle it up, let everybody know your opinion. And please feel free to leave a link to any of your recent posts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Member of The Internet Defense League

Rules on comments

As the comments sections are not intended to be general forums, comments are expected to bear some relevance to the subject of the post. Nevertheless, I do allow some generous leeway in this, particularly if I judge the comment to be of special interest.

Although I'm only too happy to link to your posts, those posts should be your own work, and not the work of others, due to copyright issues.

Follow Bryan Hemming on

Blogs I check out

Follow Bryan Hemming on
Follow Bryan Hemming on


  • 91,675 hits

Top Clicks

  • None


Caitlin Johnstone

Daily Writings About The End Of Illusions


To write about my memories, past and present

The Silent War

An exploration into understanding the complexities of the Chemical Age, the Synthetic Chemical Revolution, and the toxins that impact us all

Carol Grimes, The Singer's Tale & other yarns. An Archive.

Singer / Songwriter / Writer / Outsider / Poet / Photos / Collecting Life's Strange Things ...and a Book For Sale

Once. Again.

Une fois. Encore.

Politics and Insights

Public interest issues, policy, equality, human rights, social science, analysis


Hold your verve

El Coleccionista Hipnótico

hypnotist collector

More Crows than Eagles

More Coyotes than Wolves

Spanish scribbles

My journey into sketching and drawing in and around Jimena de la Frontera, Andalucia

%d bloggers like this: